
In an effort to curb misuse of opioids and forestall overdose deaths, the Faculty of Physicians and Surgeons of British Columbia launched a legally enforceable follow commonplace, “Protected Prescribing of Medication with Potential for Misuse/Diversion,” in 2016. This doc restricted the prescribing of opioids for continual noncancer ache (CNCP) with particular prescribing practices that clinicians have been obligated to comply with.
In analysis that examined the consequences of the 2016 follow commonplace on prescribing to sufferers with CNCP, researchers discovered that its introduction had a marked affect on prescribing practices.
The findings have been revealed within the Canadian Medical Affiliation Journal.
Pre-existing declining tendencies in doses of opioids (measured in morphine milligram equivalents) accelerated, as did declines in high-dose prescribing, coprescribing with hypnotics like benzodiazepines, and prescribing bigger provides of medicines. As effectively, the variety of sufferers who had doses aggressively tapered elevated, which may end up in improper ache administration.
The evaluation included knowledge on all opioid prescriptions distributed to community-living adults in BC between October 2012 and March 2020.
“This demonstrates the power of follow requirements to change doctor conduct but additionally highlights how misinterpretation can hurt sufferers,” writes Dr. Dimitra Panagiotoglou, affiliate professor at McGill College, Montréal, Quebec, with co-authors. “Affected person teams and physicians affected by requirements or tips ought to be consulted earlier than their launch to scale back unintended penalties.”
When the 2016 follow commonplace was changed in 2018, the downward tendencies slowed.
“These findings exhibit that prescribing tips and follow requirements can have speedy and long-lasting results on doctor prescribing. Though many of the modifications could also be constructive (e.g., fewer opioids locally, a discount in coprescribed benzodiazepine), incorrect interpretation can improve harms for some sufferers. Aggressive tapering can have downstream penalties, together with folks resorting to unregulated opioids for ache aid regardless of their dangers,” write the authors.
Folks residing with continual ache and opioid use dysfunction (OUD) in Canada are sometimes unable to entry evidence-based therapy, which may cut back the effectiveness of remedies for OUD, in keeping with a commentary in the identical situation.
“Overcoming obstacles—akin to siloed look after OUD and continual ache, and restricted entry to allied well being providers that may enhance ache administration and OUD outcomes—is important to successfully addressing the wants of sufferers with comorbid OUD and continual ache,” writes Dr. Kiran Grant with co-authors, in a associated commentary. Dr. Grant is an emergency medication resident on the College of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC.
They recommend interdisciplinary approaches, akin to together with ache administration specialists in care, may assist enhance outcomes for folks with continual ache and OUD.
Extra data:
The consequences of a provincial opioid prescribing commonplace on prescribing for ache in adults: an interrupted time-series evaluation, Canadian Medical Affiliation Journal (2025). DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.250167
Kiran Grant et al. Commentary: Integrating continual ache administration into look after sufferers with opioid use dysfunction. Canadian Medical Affiliation Journal (2025) . DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.241320
Quotation:
Opioid prescribing requirements modified practices in British Columbia, however with caveats (2025, Could 12)
retrieved 12 Could 2025
from https://medicalxpress.com/information/2025-05-opioid-standards-british-columbia-caveats.html
This doc is topic to copyright. Aside from any truthful dealing for the aim of personal research or analysis, no
half could also be reproduced with out the written permission. The content material is offered for data functions solely.